|
Post by TemplarFrost on Nov 1, 2012 20:24:11 GMT -5
Why make this? I thought My Little Pony was for little girls.
|
|
|
Post by P on Nov 2, 2012 10:12:44 GMT -5
Why not?
|
|
|
Post by TemplarFrost on Nov 2, 2012 20:11:04 GMT -5
Because My Little Pony, is for Little Girls. What part of that don't you understand?
|
|
|
Post by P on Nov 4, 2012 19:18:35 GMT -5
And these "Little Girls" have never had pets, or been to a zoo, or to a farm?
|
|
|
Post by anonymous on Nov 18, 2012 17:17:11 GMT -5
Because My Little Pony, is for Little Girls. What part of that don't you understand? And yet you are watching it. And in case you are not: Why the hell are you even here then?
|
|
|
Post by splunkablunka on Nov 23, 2012 7:44:01 GMT -5
I'm almost 100% sure Lauren's intention when making cartoons is that they are not gender or age specific.
Yet you claim the PPPP are the ones insulting her creation..
|
|
|
Post by TemplarFrost on Nov 23, 2012 12:43:35 GMT -5
And these "Little Girls" have never had pets, or been to a zoo, or to a farm? Uh, yeah, no shit... But those are real life animals, and this is a cartoon... Dude, like, what is the point in making these in the first place? Listen... It is true that animals have visible private parts, but the thing that y'all are missing is that they are only visible, because they are not intelligent, or human-like enough, to show embarrassment, or shame. But MLP ponies, on the other hand, are intelligent beings. They have regular language, government, economics, art, architecture, literature... Why would they be so advanced in society, and still their privates still showing? Now I know what you're going to say next... "So why haven't they covered up accordingly yet?" That's simply because, that's not the shows primary focus. It's not "My Little Pony: Vaginas Are Magic"; it's "My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic" So such a project is not even needed here. You're making a hyper-realistic project on a kids TV show, that isn't even remotely specific, it's sad. Now, ya'll could make as many dicks and vaginas on ponies, as many as you want. I honestly couldn't give any less of a shit. But please, stop advertising it. It's only ruining our image even more!
|
|
|
Post by P on Nov 25, 2012 16:12:58 GMT -5
And these "Little Girls" have never had pets, or been to a zoo, or to a farm? Uh, yeah, no shit... But those are real life animals, and this is a cartoon... Dude, like, what is the point in making these in the first place? Listen... It is true that animals have visible private parts, but the thing that y'all are missing is that they are only visible, because they are not intelligent, or human-like enough, to show embarrassment, or shame. But MLP ponies, on the other hand, are intelligent beings. They have regular language, government, economics, art, architecture, literature... Why would they be so advanced in society, and still their privates still showing? Now I know what you're going to say next... "So why haven't they covered up accordingly yet?" That's simply because, that's not the shows primary focus. It's not "My Little Pony: Vaginas Are Magic"; it's "My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic" So such a project is not even needed here. You're making a hyper-realistic project on a kids TV show, that isn't even remotely specific, it's sad. Now, ya'll could make as many dicks and vaginas on ponies, as many as you want. I honestly couldn't give any less of a shit. But please, stop advertising it. It's only ruining our image even more! How incredibly presumptuous of you to assume that any "intelligent beings" must have the same cultural taboos as your culture. Ponies mainly only wear clothes for special occasions, so obviously they don't have the same nudity taboo that many (but not all) humans have. Yes, the show isn't "Vaginas Are Magic". It's also not "Nostrils Are Magic". By your logic, they might as well just be amorphous blobs. I have no clue what you mean by the bolded section. I corrected several errors in your post, but can't make heads or tails of this.
|
|
|
Post by TemplarFrost on Nov 26, 2012 16:35:11 GMT -5
Uh, yeah, no shit... But those are real life animals, and this is a cartoon... Dude, like, what is the point in making these in the first place? Listen... It is true that animals have visible private parts, but the thing that y'all are missing is that they are only visible, because they are not intelligent, or human-like enough, to show embarrassment, or shame. But MLP ponies, on the other hand, are intelligent beings. They have regular language, government, economics, art, architecture, literature... Why would they be so advanced in society, and still their privates still showing? Now I know what you're going to say next... "So why haven't they covered up accordingly yet?" That's simply because, that's not the shows primary focus. It's not "My Little Pony: Vaginas Are Magic"; it's "My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic" So such a project is not even needed here. You're making a hyper-realistic project on a kids TV show, that isn't even remotely specific, it's sad. Now, ya'll could make as many dicks and vaginas on ponies, as many as you want. I honestly couldn't give any less of a shit. But please, stop advertising it. It's only ruining our image even more! How incredibly presumptuous of you to assume that any "intelligent beings" must have the same cultural taboos as your culture. Ponies mainly only wear clothes for special occasions, so obviously they don't have the same nudity taboo that many (but not all) humans have. Yes, the show isn't "Vaginas Are Magic". It's also not "Nostrils Are Magic". By your logic, they might as well just be amorphous blobs. I have no clue what you mean by the bolded section. I corrected several errors in your post, but can't make heads or tails of this. Okay first of all, let me correct that statement. You're making a hyper-realistic project on a kids TV show, that isn't even remotely realistic, it's sad.Anyways... Perhaps I have used the wrong term. "Intelligent" was not the right term to use. "Advanced" or "Developed" is. Don't get me wrong; I could sort of see where you are coming from with this project. But the thing is, it is simply the wrong franchise to do it on. And I have two reasons why. One, ponies in Equestria are advanced in their culture, I think we could agree with that. As I stated before, we have seen technology, music, art, literature, government, military, and many more aspects of a modern nation in Equestria. Now here's my beef. Why put visibly shown privates, on such an advanced culture? Sure, we have seen many tribes in South America and such, that are naked, and are living together. But their culture isn't as advanced, so nudity is common to them. But other societies (say New York) has more of an advanced and developed society, and therefore, there is no nudity. Same applies to Equestria. My bottom line is, Ponies in MLP are too advanced to have their privates flopping about. Two, My Little Pony is too unrealistic to be implementing such a hyper-realistic project, such as nudity. Yes, I get "G" rated animated animal movies, like "Spirit" has a little bit of nudity in them. But that's because it is realistic. They don't even talk. So it is fine to implement such a feature in them... My Little Pony on the other hand, is not realistic. The very same horses you are trying to make realistic (by putting privates on them), are flying, using magic, brightly colored, cloning themselves, playing flugle horns, talking, playing instruments, dancing... you get my point. So why put such a realistic feature, in something that isn't even remotely realistic, as I said before. It would not give viewers understanding of the realistic veiwpoint, but just sadden, amuse, or even anger the fans more. Now. Here is why I'm here. I don't care if you draw privates on ponies, as long as you keep it to yourselves. Please, like I said before, doing this would only worsen our image. You could say that is false, but i'm sure you have read "Encyclopedia Dramatica's" article on it. And also, please don't edit actual episodes, and post them on the internet. As you should know, the staff (especially writers) are somewhat connected to the internet fandom community. So posting such stuff on the internet would be directly disrespecting their hard work. It's one thing to make explicit art of another's hard work. It's another to actually edit their hard work, and make it explicit. Now that's just rude.
|
|
|
Post by P on Nov 29, 2012 13:34:36 GMT -5
Again, you're wrong. There are plenty of people and places in first-world countries that do not have the same nudity taboo as you do. We know for a fact that Equestria does not have a nudity taboo. We also know that they have genitalia.
As far as your point about realism goes, refer back to my earlier comment. By your logic, they might as well just be amorphous blobs. Why include any anatomy at all?
Yes, not everyone is a fan of the PPPP. That doesn't mean we're going to stop. If no one did anything that had any opposition, no one would do anything.
As far as "rude" goes, that's subjective, and the same argument could be applied to R34 of the show, because the characters themselves are also "their hard work".
|
|
|
Post by TemplarFrost on Nov 29, 2012 19:20:44 GMT -5
Again, you're wrong. There are plenty of people and places in first-world countries that do not have the same nudity taboo as you do. We know for a fact that Equestria does not have a nudity taboo. We also know that they have genitalia. Didn't you read what I said? I acknowledged that fact. But I also explained that a lack of nudity taboos are only in lesser-developed countries. Equestria is not an under-developed society... As far as your point about realism goes, refer back to my earlier comment. By your logic, they might as well just be amorphous blobs. Why include any anatomy at all? You, in fact, you all, need to learn the difference between regular body parts, (Like feet, hands, fingers, eyes, noses) and reproductive/excretory body parts. They are hidden, because it is simply the developed being's morality to do so. Listen... You keep arguing that many under-developed countries have no nudity taboo... Yet My Little Pony's civilizations are not underdevelopedYou argue that many real-life zoo animals have nudity... Yet My Little Pony isn't, or anywhere near realisticYou argue that there is no difference between genitalia and regular body parts... But there is, and you know it.Why do you think that people gets sexually aroused when hey see genitalia/teats of the opposite/same sex? And not any other body part? Also, don't give me that BS about "MLP Ponies not being human" because even though their physique is like animals, their mentality is very much developed-human. Yes, not everyone is a fan of the PPPP. That doesn't mean we're going to stop. If no one did anything that had any opposition, no one would do anything. That only applies to opposition to important/significant goals. Patriots had opposition from Redcoats, but fought on anyways. Hence America. MLK Jr. had opposition from many whites, yet he fought on anyways. Hence Civil Rights. You are having opposition from other people, with common sense. Yet you are fighting on anyways. What do you want to accomplish? Genitals on pastel-colored Ponies Yippee As far as "rude" goes, that's subjective, and the same argument could be applied to R34 of the show, because the characters themselves are also "their hard work". Uh, yeah... Did you read my post about that? I mentioned that too. R34 is still disrespectful to staff and all... But you see, R34 is only representing hard work from the staff. You want to directly deface and edit their hard work, exactly, by editing episodes from the show. There is a difference, and you really shouldn't do that. Because it is even more disrespectful.
|
|
|
Post by P on Nov 30, 2012 17:07:41 GMT -5
Again, you're wrong. There are plenty of people and places in first-world countries that do not have the same nudity taboo as you do. We know for a fact that Equestria does not have a nudity taboo. We also know that they have genitalia. Didn't you read what I said? I acknowledged that fact. But I also explained that a lack of nudity taboos are only in lesser-developed countries. Equestria is not an under-developed society... You did not "explain" anything. You merely stated a factual untruth. There are plenty of places in the first world that do not have a nudity taboo, and Equestria does not have one either. There is no moral difference between the reproductive system, the circulatory system, or the digestive system. They are all simply a collection of organs that work together towards a common goal. For the nine billionth time, nudity taboos are not monolithic or universal. Also, Equestria does not have a nudity taboo. This is an established fact. Again, the same argument could be used on any body part. I see you think you know what I think better than I do. Um, getting sexually aroused by looking at genitalia is a function of the reproductive system. People also salivate when they see food. It's a basic response to a stimulus. Also, for your information, this has a significant cultural aspect as well, as this reaction is much stronger in cultures with nudity taboos. In much stricter cultures (such as Victorian England) even catching a bit of leg was considered sexy. You seem to be assuming that sex and sexuality are inherently immoral, which frankly is a very unhealthy mindset. This is refuting an argument I never made, so I'm just gonna skip it. Um, firstly, I never compared myself to Martin Luther King Junior. Secondly, since when is sticking to your guns only for huge generation-defining movements? Um, "common sense" is a very subjective thing, and usually translates as "whatever the majority says", which generally (well, by definition) isn't what revolutionaries (like the Civil Rights leaders) are promoting. If you don't like it you could always, oh, I don't know, leave? I covered that in my post. The characters and settings are as much "their hard work" as the show itself. Anyway, it's not your job to say which derivative works are "disrespectful" and which aren't. Artists will make what they will make, and you are free to like or dislike whatever you want, but don't try to stop people from making things you personally disapprove of; that's called censorship, and is generally frowned upon by these "developed cultures" you seem so fond of.
|
|
|
Post by gaston on Feb 26, 2013 15:30:45 GMT -5
lol, sickfuck.
You should put penises in tom & jerry too, xd.
Well, I am in your side about having our genitalia visible. I like to see other female humans genitalia...
But this is a cartoon show that belongs to the human culture. If this show was made for kids in a culture that we cannot see our genitals in public, you are going against the culture.
The problem with this is the stupidity. You should walk on the street naked instead, and try to fix the problem from the root of it. Drawing a bunch of dicks and vagoos in a cartoon show is simply stupid. I would bet my balls that you wont make a change in society with that.
|
|
|
Post by P on Mar 12, 2013 20:17:16 GMT -5
What's wrong with going against a culture?
|
|
|
Post by jpny2008 on Jun 29, 2013 16:31:26 GMT -5
Listen, I'm okay with bronies, but this is just wrong to go through all this work to make animal genitals on little ponies on ANY TV show. This is wrong in this day and age.
|
|